Retail- vs. Professional day traders.. tf1 with traders may be different!

» Sometimes you have to go another way, to get to your destination… particularly, if one wants to leave the area as a visionary brokerage unnecessary structures and achieve a change in thinking! «

Professional market participants vs.. Retail-Trader – The ‹tf1›Team wants to deprive anyone of his dreams, But the so-called retail trader should know, at which point he is in the food chain of the financial industry – usually at the end. A healthy dose of realism is strongly encouraged. The following diagram briefly explain this once and show the difference to professional market participants:

This results in latency – If one follows, based on the above chart, the way of the task order at the retail traders back to the Stocks, one can easily see, that arise from that is not only unpleasant latency in order execution. No – it also simultaneously increases the order for a transaction fee and it steadily for a service, which is seen in the technical handling of her, relatively easily without much effort as “Mass market” feasible.

“Commission-Spreading” – call the members of ‹tf1› this circumstance, because this year by the way the gross income of each trade – by the interposition of several institutions – not reduced or negligible. is sometimes even negated. Under these conditions it appears ‹tf1› not useful, Members of the desired brokers, Negotiate discounts, especially since the order fees would then lie still above the market average… as shown by the following examples:

» E*Trade(NanoTrader | PATSystems)

» daytradeaustria (NinjaTrader | Zen-Fire)

» daytradeaustria (Strategy Runner | CTS)

The solution! – If possible, tries to ‹tf1› Build network in these cases usually identical infrastructure, shorten the path of order routing for Members, either by open negotiations with the clearer, or even with one of its Introducing Brokers. The result is then determined according to ‹tf1› Individuathe documented.